Print ArticleA friend just forwarded a proposed Michigan bill to me. Michigan House Bill 6395, which proposes to strictly regulate all dog breeders. You can keep up with proposed animal legislation by going to: ADOA (American Dog Owners Association) site at: www.adoa.org
In part Michigan House Bill 6395 would do the following:
(1) Define anyone who sells or offers for sale more than two dogs per year, or more than one litter of dogs per year, as a 'pet seller.'
(2) Mandate that those who qualify as pet sellers to acquire an annual pet seller license from their county animal control shelter at a cost of $200/year.
(3) Require an applicant for a pet seller license to submit his or her fingerprints with a license application for a criminal history and FBI background check.
(4) Give discretion to county animal control shelters to deny applications for pet seller licenses, regardless of outcome of background investigation.
(5) Call for pet sellers to comply with administrative rules regarding housing that will be financially detrimental to responsible breeders who operate out of their homes.
Readers need to recognize that this bill is not unique. Similar unconstitutional bills are being passed across the country. Such bills are not about safeguarding animals, they are about making money. States have found that racketeering is alive and well in America and they want their share of the plunder. You, the animal lover/breeder, are their prey. Why? Because you do not know your rights under the law. You are, therefore, an easy target.
There are several ways to keep yourself from becoming a victim of the animal rights people and corrupt legislators who write and sponsor such unconstitutional bills and from the greedy States using such bills as a lucrative new source of income on which they pay NO IRS taxes. But the issue of stiffing the IRS is not the one being discussed here so for now, we will pass over that.
Obviously you want to try to stop the passage of such bills. To do that, you really need to inform legislators that they are breaking the law if they pass such bills. Send them the cases contained in this document as proof that they are about to violate the Amendments of the Constitution of the United States of America.
Your simplest protection if you are not successful in stopping the unconstitutional legislation is to educate yourself in the laws designed to protect you.
FIRST, owning and breeding animals is a natural right given to man by God. I would quote the passages from the Bible, but hopefully you all know those and they would be redundant here. In case you do not, go to "Genesis" and read it.
See Murdock v. Pennsylvania, 319 US 105 (1943), "No state shall convert a liberty into a privilege, license it, and attach a fee to it."
See Shuttlesworth v. Birmingham, 373 US 262 (1963), "If the state converts a liberty into a privilege, the citizen can engage in the right with impunity."
SECOND, animals are PROPERTY under the law. Property laws forbid a person, county, town, state, or federal government from interfering with private, legally owned property unless there is an imminent threat of danger to the public welfare and safety. And even then, all that can be taken is a diseased animal which MUST be paid for by the government BEFORE the "taking". No one can walk onto private property and steal everything that property owner has.
See Amendment #4 "The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched and the persons or things to be seized."
See Amendment #5 "…nor be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor shall private property be taken for public use, without just compensation."
See Amendment #14 "…No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws."
See United States v. James Daniel Good Real Property, (92-1180), 510 U.S. 43 (1993). "…The Due Process Clause of the Fifth Amendment guarantees that "[n]o person shall…be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law. Our precedents establish the general rule that individuals must receive notice and an opportunity to be heard before the government deprives them of property."
What this case says is that there MUST be Notice AND a Hearing BEFORE anyone can take anything from you. However, see below, the Prosecutor and the Courts have absolutely no jurisdiction over a living, breathing person once you inform them that you are a Non Corporate Entity who is challenging their jurisdiction. (See below for more on this.)
See United States v. $8,850, 461 U.S. 555, 562, n. 12 (1983); Fuentes v. Shevin, 407 U.S. 67, (1972); Snidach v. Family Finance Corp. of Bay View, 395 U.S. 337, 342 (1969) (Harlan, J. concurring); Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co., 339 U.S. 306, 313 (1950).
See Jones v. Mayer Co., 392 U.S. 409 (1968) (Argument & Summation); Private property is owned & controlled by private individuals. There is no monetary or proprietary interest that a government at any level has in controlling property belonging to a private individual. The property owner decides with whom he/she wishes to negotiate, procure a contract, dispose of or improve property.
See Beech Grove Investment v. Michigan Civil Rights Commission (Argument & Summation) M.C.L.A. Const. 1963 art. 5 Section 29; The government cannot force a private property owner to enter a contract with another. The property owner is free to negotiate his/her own contract & dispose of his/her private property as he/she chooses. The property owner has full control over his/her property.
See Carrera v. Bertaini, 63 D.A. 3d 721; 134 Cal. Rptr. 14: {I}mpoundment of an owner´s farm animals without prior notice or hearing, & without a hearing in the superior court was unlawful…
Chicago, B. & Q.R. Co. v. Chicago, 166 U.S. 226 (1897), prohibits the government from taking private property for public use without just compensation.
Remember that no lower court can overturn the rulings of an upper court and the U.S. Supreme Court is the highest court in our land. In the above cases, when you see "U.S." or "US" it means the case is a United States Supreme Court ruling. All of the cases quoted in this document are U.S. Supreme Court rulings EXCEPT for: "Beech Grove Investment v. Michigan Civil Rights Commission" and "Carrera v. Bertaini".
THIRD, please see "When Vultures Rule - - A New Day For The People – One" regarding the fact that the courts are FOREIGN STATES operating under international law and cannot charge a living, breathing American citizen (Non Corporate Entity, i.e., you) as they DO NOT HAVE JURISDICTION.
Please remember that Jurisdiction MUST be established by the Plaintiff (your accuser) and NOT by the judge (court). Such jurisdiction must be in writing and must be filed into the case. Plaintiff cannot provide jurisdiction because the court does not have it.
Safeguard your property (animals) jealously because your house, land, children will be next. In Maine the State organized criminal racketeering enterprise is already stealing houses, land and the contents of houses along with the animals. Typically Child Protective Services and Elder Services are then sent in to try to steal the children or find fault with elders. We are living in Hitler´s Germany. You and the members of any national group with whom you align yourself are your only protection.
Note that the DOJ (Department of Justice), FBI (Federal Bureau of Investigation), and Homeland Security have all refused to investigate the racketeering even though they are being paid by you. It is my considered opinion that these United Nations law enforcement groups are getting kickbacks from the racketeers to refuse to conduct an investigation.
Remember that John Stossel of 20/20 in his investigative report called "Cruelty to Pet Owners?" which aired in June 2005 learned that just ONE SPCA in Dallas, Texas made SIX MILLION DOLLARS in just ONE YEAR by stealing animals from their rightful owners and begging the public for money then selling the animals.
You MUST know your rights! You MUST enforce your rights! DO NOT take "NO" for an answer!
In part Michigan House Bill 6395 would do the following:
(1) Define anyone who sells or offers for sale more than two dogs per year, or more than one litter of dogs per year, as a 'pet seller.'
(2) Mandate that those who qualify as pet sellers to acquire an annual pet seller license from their county animal control shelter at a cost of $200/year.
(3) Require an applicant for a pet seller license to submit his or her fingerprints with a license application for a criminal history and FBI background check.
(4) Give discretion to county animal control shelters to deny applications for pet seller licenses, regardless of outcome of background investigation.
(5) Call for pet sellers to comply with administrative rules regarding housing that will be financially detrimental to responsible breeders who operate out of their homes.
Readers need to recognize that this bill is not unique. Similar unconstitutional bills are being passed across the country. Such bills are not about safeguarding animals, they are about making money. States have found that racketeering is alive and well in America and they want their share of the plunder. You, the animal lover/breeder, are their prey. Why? Because you do not know your rights under the law. You are, therefore, an easy target.
There are several ways to keep yourself from becoming a victim of the animal rights people and corrupt legislators who write and sponsor such unconstitutional bills and from the greedy States using such bills as a lucrative new source of income on which they pay NO IRS taxes. But the issue of stiffing the IRS is not the one being discussed here so for now, we will pass over that.
Obviously you want to try to stop the passage of such bills. To do that, you really need to inform legislators that they are breaking the law if they pass such bills. Send them the cases contained in this document as proof that they are about to violate the Amendments of the Constitution of the United States of America.
Your simplest protection if you are not successful in stopping the unconstitutional legislation is to educate yourself in the laws designed to protect you.
FIRST, owning and breeding animals is a natural right given to man by God. I would quote the passages from the Bible, but hopefully you all know those and they would be redundant here. In case you do not, go to "Genesis" and read it.
See Murdock v. Pennsylvania, 319 US 105 (1943), "No state shall convert a liberty into a privilege, license it, and attach a fee to it."
See Shuttlesworth v. Birmingham, 373 US 262 (1963), "If the state converts a liberty into a privilege, the citizen can engage in the right with impunity."
SECOND, animals are PROPERTY under the law. Property laws forbid a person, county, town, state, or federal government from interfering with private, legally owned property unless there is an imminent threat of danger to the public welfare and safety. And even then, all that can be taken is a diseased animal which MUST be paid for by the government BEFORE the "taking". No one can walk onto private property and steal everything that property owner has.
See Amendment #4 "The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched and the persons or things to be seized."
See Amendment #5 "…nor be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor shall private property be taken for public use, without just compensation."
See Amendment #14 "…No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws."
See United States v. James Daniel Good Real Property, (92-1180), 510 U.S. 43 (1993). "…The Due Process Clause of the Fifth Amendment guarantees that "[n]o person shall…be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law. Our precedents establish the general rule that individuals must receive notice and an opportunity to be heard before the government deprives them of property."
What this case says is that there MUST be Notice AND a Hearing BEFORE anyone can take anything from you. However, see below, the Prosecutor and the Courts have absolutely no jurisdiction over a living, breathing person once you inform them that you are a Non Corporate Entity who is challenging their jurisdiction. (See below for more on this.)
See United States v. $8,850, 461 U.S. 555, 562, n. 12 (1983); Fuentes v. Shevin, 407 U.S. 67, (1972); Snidach v. Family Finance Corp. of Bay View, 395 U.S. 337, 342 (1969) (Harlan, J. concurring); Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co., 339 U.S. 306, 313 (1950).
See Jones v. Mayer Co., 392 U.S. 409 (1968) (Argument & Summation); Private property is owned & controlled by private individuals. There is no monetary or proprietary interest that a government at any level has in controlling property belonging to a private individual. The property owner decides with whom he/she wishes to negotiate, procure a contract, dispose of or improve property.
See Beech Grove Investment v. Michigan Civil Rights Commission (Argument & Summation) M.C.L.A. Const. 1963 art. 5 Section 29; The government cannot force a private property owner to enter a contract with another. The property owner is free to negotiate his/her own contract & dispose of his/her private property as he/she chooses. The property owner has full control over his/her property.
See Carrera v. Bertaini, 63 D.A. 3d 721; 134 Cal. Rptr. 14: {I}mpoundment of an owner´s farm animals without prior notice or hearing, & without a hearing in the superior court was unlawful…
Chicago, B. & Q.R. Co. v. Chicago, 166 U.S. 226 (1897), prohibits the government from taking private property for public use without just compensation.
Remember that no lower court can overturn the rulings of an upper court and the U.S. Supreme Court is the highest court in our land. In the above cases, when you see "U.S." or "US" it means the case is a United States Supreme Court ruling. All of the cases quoted in this document are U.S. Supreme Court rulings EXCEPT for: "Beech Grove Investment v. Michigan Civil Rights Commission" and "Carrera v. Bertaini".
THIRD, please see "When Vultures Rule - - A New Day For The People – One" regarding the fact that the courts are FOREIGN STATES operating under international law and cannot charge a living, breathing American citizen (Non Corporate Entity, i.e., you) as they DO NOT HAVE JURISDICTION.
Please remember that Jurisdiction MUST be established by the Plaintiff (your accuser) and NOT by the judge (court). Such jurisdiction must be in writing and must be filed into the case. Plaintiff cannot provide jurisdiction because the court does not have it.
Safeguard your property (animals) jealously because your house, land, children will be next. In Maine the State organized criminal racketeering enterprise is already stealing houses, land and the contents of houses along with the animals. Typically Child Protective Services and Elder Services are then sent in to try to steal the children or find fault with elders. We are living in Hitler´s Germany. You and the members of any national group with whom you align yourself are your only protection.
Note that the DOJ (Department of Justice), FBI (Federal Bureau of Investigation), and Homeland Security have all refused to investigate the racketeering even though they are being paid by you. It is my considered opinion that these United Nations law enforcement groups are getting kickbacks from the racketeers to refuse to conduct an investigation.
Remember that John Stossel of 20/20 in his investigative report called "Cruelty to Pet Owners?" which aired in June 2005 learned that just ONE SPCA in Dallas, Texas made SIX MILLION DOLLARS in just ONE YEAR by stealing animals from their rightful owners and begging the public for money then selling the animals.
You MUST know your rights! You MUST enforce your rights! DO NOT take "NO" for an answer!
view author's RSS feed
